The ASA/CAP have released a post called: Oh what a tangled web – Misleading ads. I have enclosed the text of the link below, but please have a look at the ASA/CAP site as there are lots of things of interest to anyone with an interest in Ethical Marketing.
Although it’s usually the ‘harm and offence’ rulings that hit the headlines, roughly 70% of the complaints the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) receives each year concern potentially misleading advertising. Making sure your advertising doesn’t mislead consumers might seem straightforward, but it’s a broad area that often requires careful navigation by marketers across all sectors.
Here we share the underlying principles.
The rules in this area are broadly the same for both non-broadcast and broadcast advertising, but for simplicity we’ll focus on the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing (the CAP Code).
There are various elements to the ‘Misleading Advertising’ sections in the Advertising Codes, but the overarching principle is captured in Rule 3.1 which states that “marketing communications must not materially mislead or be likely to do so”.
The ‘background’ to Section 3 in the CAP Code also explains that the ASA will take into account the overall impression created by an ad, as well as specific claims, and will rule on the basis of the likely effect on consumers – not the marketer’s intentions. So, the ASA can, and will, find against an advertiser even if it wasn’t their intention to mislead.
How does the ASA judge whether something is misleading?
There are two main ‘tests’ that the ASA applies to judge whether an ad or claim is misleading, and both ‘tests’ must be satisfied. In making judgments the ASA also considers to whom the ad was addressed and what message the target audience are likely to understand from it.
Marketing communications are considered to be misleading if they:
- are likely to deceive consumers; and
- are likely to cause consumers to take transactional decisions that they would not otherwise have taken.
What is meant by deceive?
Ads or claims can deceive consumers by ambiguity, through presentation or by omitting important information. In short, that is information that the consumer needs to make informed decisions in relation to a product or service. They can also, of course, mislead by including false or incorrect information.
What’s a transactional decision?
The transactional decision ‘test’ essentially means that the misleading claim has to affect the consumer’s behaviour. A transactional decision does not only involve the decision of whether or not to make a purchase, but can also be a matter of simply making further enquiries or navigating further into an advertiser’s website, for example.
What does it mean in practice?
Ultimately, you should try to be as clear as possible in your communications with consumers. This means that as well as not making false claims, you shouldn’t hide information from them or exaggerate any claims you plan to make.
You should also make sure that you hold evidence for any objective claims you make i.e. claims that consumers would expect to be proved. Claims that can’t be proved include, for example, ‘puffery’ or opinion. Advertisers must always hold the evidence for a claim before publishing the ad.
How do I get it right?
The best way to make sure you don’t fall foul of the rules in this area, aside from checking against the rules and guidance, is to put yourself in your audience’s shoes. Forget what you know and try to read your ad with the same level of knowledge as your audience – does it still mean what you thought it did?
For more on misleading advertising, see our AdviceOnline article here. Our Copy Advice team are also on hand to provide free, bespoke advice on whether particular non-broadcast ads are clear enough to avoid misleading consumers.